Search for: "In Re Doe, III"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2014, 7:47 am
Statutory MootnessThe Court in SCH Corp. does not reach the concept of "statutory mootness". [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 11:03 am
Kuhne, III. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
How does the current proposal depart from the established systems? [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
Background III. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
” CNX Gas III at *1. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:12 pm
The Letter was sent in response to and in support of the ongoing efforts of the DOE’s Program Integrity and Improvement Negotiated Rulemaking Committee (the “Committee”) over the last several months to consider, among other things, revisions to the DOE’s Title IV’s cash management rules (34 CFR 668, Subpart K), including those relating to acceptable methods of disbursement of eligible Title IV funds to students (34 CFR 668.164). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
(“Lee/In re Aspen”) for discovery purposes and each case maintained its separate character. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
While applying TransUnion, Judge Matey does not spare it from criticism. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
But today, we’re going to focus on Title III of the ADA. [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:46 am
If a plaintiff satisfies Article III for a claim, as Mason unquestionably did, why does Article III also govern whether s/he gets to ask for each and every form of remedy that might be available, when a statute makes multiple remedies available?) [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 3:58 pm
In re Chesnut, 422 F.3d 298, 302 (5th Cir. 2005), In re Repine, 536 F.3d 512 (5th Cir. 2008), and Campbell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
What does it mean to say a guy is "creepy" or is a "stalker"? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Further, contrary to Plaintiffs' contention, the California Supreme Court's decision in In re Tobacco II, 46 Cal.4th 298, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 559, 207 P.3d 20 (Cal.2009), does not establish that absent class members in a federal class action need not have Article III standing. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:07 pm
This isn’t the same thing as saying that Mexico now fully recognizes gay marriages in the way that, say, Canada does. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
While the Army Times does not provide details about the fraud allegations, they're reputed (unconfirmed) to involve disputed Army contracts with the girlfriend's family.COL Johnson returns fire with accusations that Kristina's Early Return of Dependents (ERD) order was prompted by his wife's improperly running the Family Readiness Group at Vicenza, charges those who worked with Kristina dispute. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:33 am
As I read it, she grants summary judgment on Article III standing grounds. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
Regardless of how it got there, it does appear that the court has a valid point that an MAO can bring a private cause of action under §1395y(b)(3)(A) instead of §1395y(b)(2)(B)(iii). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
What obligations does the new legislation place on prime contractors? [read post]
