Search for: "In re: B " Results 161 - 180 of 30,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2009, 12:12 pm
Pines and Ardith Bronson look at 30(b)(6) depositions from the defense point of view:Your company has just been served with a 30(b)(6) deposition notice under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and it is your job to respond to the notice and determine who will testify on behalf of the corporation. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:26 pm by mlhale
In addition, the Federal Court House Building is named after Carl B. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:51 am by Larry Ribstein
Moreover, the transaction in question was disclosed to and approved by AIG and General Re’s independent auditors. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Res judicata defense based on prior action in federal court The claim-preclusive effect of a federal-court judgment on a federal-question claim is determined by federal res judicata principles. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:33 pm
The decision of In re Bilski focuses on a patent application filed in 1997 that claims a method for hedging risk in the field of commodities trading. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
Intercargo Corp., 768 A.2d 492 (Del.Ch.2000); In re Lukens Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§§ 6(b), 134(b), and 315(a).We AFFIRM.In this re-exam matter, there was separate district court litigation:Moreover, we need not defer to the District Court’s interpretation, asthe District Court uses a different standard in interpreting claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Daily Record Staff
Juvenile law — illegal sentence — Detention in out-of-state facility The appellant, A.B., was adjudicated delinquent at the age of thirteen by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, sitting as a juvenile court, on August 31, 2012, upon entering a plea of involved to two counts of attempted armed robbery. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm by Daily Record Staff
.), Criminal Law Article (“CL”) §§ 7-105(b), 7-203 (a) , and 7-104(g)(2), respectively. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:47 am by Daily Record Staff
., appellant, to the custody of the Department of Juvenile Services (“DJS”) for a Level B, non-community based placement. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:40 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
In In re: Castillo, the Bankruptcy Court for Central District of California held that “after making an 1111(b) election, an undersecured creditor may include in its 1111(b) secured claim post-petition attorneys’ fees, but not post-petition interest. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:40 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
In In re: Castillo, the Bankruptcy Court for Central District of California held that “after making an 1111(b) election, an undersecured creditor may include in its 1111(b) secured claim post-petition attorneys’ fees, but not post-petition interest. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:40 am by Binder & Malter, LLP
In In re: Castillo, the Bankruptcy Court for Central District of California held that “after making an 1111(b) election, an undersecured creditor may include in its 1111(b) secured claim post-petition attorneys’ fees, but not post-petition interest. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 46 First Amended Complaint 124 B&G Motion to Dismiss 136 Devon Motion to Dismiss 148 US Motion to Dismiss 162 Donelson Response to B&G Motion to Dismiss 163 Donelson Response to Devon Motion to Dismiss 166 Donelson Response to US Motion to Dismiss 170 B&G Reply 174 US Reply 175 Devon Reply [read post]