Search for: "In re Appellate-Motion Electronic Filing"
Results 161 - 180
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
As I indicated, for the travel of the case, the Appellant filed an appeal seeking to overrule the District Court’s decision that Appellant violated the cited statute, 11-52-4.2. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:23 pm
Randy Smith and Murguia of the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in In re National Security Letter, Under Seal v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
Late on Friday they both filed replies in support of their motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), i.e., motions to overrule the jury. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
Wife filed a motion to dismiss.On April 3, 2012, the court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Husband's claim for absolute divorce, and, because Wife's responsive pleading asserted that the couple had `cohabitated and engaged in marital relations’ while the case was pending, the court ruled that it would first hear testimony on the threshold question of whether Husband could establish grounds for an absolute divorce. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 6:31 am
Ironically, of course, their argument comes when written argumentation is becoming easier and faster (via computers, electronic filing, etc.). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Yelp noted that numerous appellate courts, most notably in Dendrite v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
The case came to the 9th Circuit from the District Court’s denial of EA’s motion. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
The case came to the 9th Circuit from the District Court’s denial of EA’s motion. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:41 am
The case came to the 9th Circuit from the District Court's denial of EA's motion. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
The district court shot down the argument that ReDigi, which tried to create a “re-sale” market for digital music files, was engaged in fair use of the relevant copyrighted works. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Electronic Arts Hollywood Reporter. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Google appellate hearing for December 4, 2013 http://t.co/UX3Bp7xIHn -> Gough v DPP, Freedom of expression: nakedness in a public place http://t.co/RD4ci7rq2b -> Halloween Jewelry Copying Scares Up A Copyright Infringement Lawsuit http://t.co/CbyiG8ssV0 -> Righthaven Revisited: What the Ninth Circuit Got Wrong http://t.co/eKEALjmUmn -> IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Case Update for Motion Picture Studios and Television Networks http://t.co/iBOcnP9POl -> France: a… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:58 pm
Registration consists of “a statement in writing signed by the sex offender giving the information that is required by the division and division shall enter the information into an appropriate electronic data base or file. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Google appellate hearing for December 4, 2013 http://t.co/UX3Bp7xIHn -> Gough v DPP, Freedom of expression: nakedness in a public place http://t.co/RD4ci7rq2b -> Halloween Jewelry Copying Scares Up A Copyright Infringement Lawsuit http://t.co/CbyiG8ssV0 -> Righthaven Revisited: What the Ninth Circuit Got Wrong http://t.co/eKEALjmUmn -> IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Case Update for Motion Picture Studios and Television Networks http://t.co/iBOcnP9POl -> France: a… [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:08 am
And, prior to obtaining FISC authorization to conduct foreign electronic surveillance (what many consider to be “traditional FISA”), Leahy-Sensenbrenner would have the government provide to the FISC either the identity of the target, or a description “with particularity” of the target. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Patel — who may be lost to buck fever — has filed a motion asking for leave to file more motions despite the court's rather unambiguous signal. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
Similarly, most exhibits attached to pre-trial and post-trial motions were ordered unsealed.The unusual posture:These appeals are unique in that neither the appellant, Apple, nor the cross-appellant, Samsung, opposes the other party’s requested relief. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
The First Amendment issue was raised not in a motion for summary judgment, but in a special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
