Search for: "In re Application of Google Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Google, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
Last month, it was the terms and conditions of Google that were subjected to judicial scrutiny, in a decision handed by the same Tribunal on 12 February 2019 (decision: Paris Tribunal (Tribunal de Grande Instance), UFC-Que Choisir v Google Inc (12 February 2019), see here for the decision in French). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:26 am
Chien , 120 USPQ2d 1710, 1713 (TTAB 2016) (citing In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010)). [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Univar USA, Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:23 am
Imagine a tool that lets you view, manage, and use all of your social networks in one screen, avoiding the need to shift from one to the other or the need to check whether you’re connected via Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ when you send a friend a message. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges whittled the applications down to 25. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
These nine firms found such keyword bidding to be worth the cost, and Google determined their advertisements were sufficiently relevant to warrant display. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:35 am
" In re Charles S. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Nike used LDNR, including as part of the phrases "Nothing beats a LDNR" and "Show you're a LDNR", in a high-profile advertising campaign (featuring social media activity, a short film, events, adverts at football matches, and so on). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:08 am
" In re Thermo LabSystems Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1285, 1289 (TTAB 2007). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:13 am
We expect that the vetoed bills will re-emerge, and may receive a more favorable gubernatorial consideration. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, Inc., 307 F. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Glassdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
Uber https://t.co/7dOwAKQA9k 2018-06-19 Body/Performance art loses in court https://t.co/zW9cMFdn0D 2018-06-19 Copibec et l’Université Laval concluent une entente hors cour en matière de droits d’auteurs https://t.co/dvYbSpnPBo 2018-06-19 National Digital and Data Consultations https://t.co/qHDbXA0bL6 2018-06-19 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-06-19 https://t.co/bN3bIGzC4d 2018-06-20 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-06-19 https://t.co/F9wi66xo9R… [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 7:01 pm
" Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:45 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK As more states move to legalize cannabis for recreational use, Mark A.R. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND DoorDash customers in over two hundred cities can use a mobile application to order food from certain restaurants. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]
