Search for: "In re Dow" Results 161 - 180 of 928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am by Beth Graham
Under the standards for public-policy and manifest-disregard challenges, we conclude, Dow has not established that the contract award—more precisely, the portion of the award reaching past the 2023 expiration of the RE’962 reissue patent— must be vacated based on Brulotte. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:31 pm by Schachtman
Dow Corning Corp., c.a. 94-1199-A (Dallas Cty. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
This particularly doesn’t make sense if you’re talking about retirement money. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:26 am by Daniel Shaviro
Again, Dow 36,000 offered a specific prediction with an equally specific analysis behind it. [read post]
By Vanessa James We’re a company that’s so successful and everywhere you go, you see a scratchy, hairy fastener and you say… Hey, that’s Velcro. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
  According to Dow, the defendants "hatched and carried out a scheme in which they hired former Dow employees with knowledge of the relevant technology and used the trade secrets embodied in that technology to manufacture and sell polymers in competition with Dow" and break into the US market. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Indeed, the joint judgment of Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ in Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
Houston Court of Appeals holds that (re)litigation of the counterclaims was barred because arb award had res judicata effect, and affirms adverse summary judgment on counterclaims. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson fretted that “we’re not getting it done” in the war in Southeast Asia, and in fact that “we’re losing,” according to the vivid testimony of the current PBS documentary on that war. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:48 am by Robert B. Lamm
  If you provide for limited or no voting rights, you’re out – no ifs, ands or buts. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:48 am by Robert B. Lamm
  If you provide for limited or no voting rights, you’re out – no ifs, ands or buts. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:01 am by Tom Smith
You're better off not knowing the ups and downs as long as you know where the gyrations ended up. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:48 pm by GJEL
“That was the genesis of the lawsuit and we’re very pleased that the matter has been solved. [read post]