Search for: "In re J. R. (1970)"
Results 161 - 180
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906); In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 (2d Cir. 1973) (Friendly, J.). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Pataki (1999): [J]ust as the First Amendment protects a legislator's right to communicate with administrative officials to provide assistance in securing a publicly funded contract, so too does it protect the legislator's right to state publicly his criticism of the granting of such a contract to a given entity and to urge to the administrators that such an award would contravene public policy. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
(J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The first was the immobilization of securities, which Congress authorized in the early 1970s to solve the paperwork crisis that was slowing share transfers to a degree that threatened market efficiency. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:13 pm
The Wrong Way to Reinvent Media, Part 2: Broadcast Spectrum Taxes to Subsidize Public Media PFF Progress on Point 17.2 [PDF] by Adam Thierer* In an ongoing series of essays, we‘re discussing proposals to have the government play a greater role in the media sector in the name of sustaining struggling enterprises or “saving journalism. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
BankChampaign, so they know what they’re doing. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[6] The level of protection given to speech depends on its categorization, with political speech receiving the greatest and commercial speech receiving the lowest.[7]Accordingly, government regulations of political and other core noncommercial speech are subject to the highest standard of strict scrutiny, while commercial speech regulations are only subject to intermediate scrutiny.[8] Finally, some limited categories of speech receive no protection at all, including obscenity, defamation,… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Originally grew out of access to medicine, and that really is about patents/R&D. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In this column, I’ll explain why this ruling hearkens back to mistakes of the 1970s, when courts, including the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Katherine J. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
” This would take the agency “Back to the Future”—to the late 1970s, when the agency reached the height of its efforts to regulate purely on “unfairness” grounds by trying to ban advertising to children. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
Paradoxically, the BSA promotes the wholesomeness of its programs while knowing that since the 1940s it has been secretly removing scoutmasters for child sexual abuse at an alarming rate, which in the 1970s, reached an average of one every three days. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Lewin Although same-sex couples in several states sued in the 1970s to challenge the refusal of various county clerks to issue them marriage licenses, the modern same-sex marriage controversy dates in earnest only to the early 1990s. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Others have sketched the history by which gay and lesbian activists gradually increased their representation in the deliberative bodies of the Church, beginning in the 1970s and increasing steadily until General Convention 2003. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In the days before no-fault divorce, which was “invented” in the early 1970s, so-called migratory divorce was a problem as spouses tried to find ways to evade their home states’ strict divorce laws. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pa. 2011)(Rufe, J.). [read post]
