Search for: "In re L.J.-1 and L.J.-2"
Results 161 - 180
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
2. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
Volcani recommended against the Father's proposed move to Texas, believing that it would interfere with this 2 1/2 year old's bonding with Mother because of the distance (based upon current best mental health opinions on the developmental stages of children). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
New Hampshire, 10-8974, which was argued on November 2. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
Nothing is accidental in Communist Cuba, everything has a political purpose.[1] I. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
”; quoting In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
I mean, we’re all stuck here for a while. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:25 am
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Aligning Emerging Global Strategies to Combat Corporate Corruption," The International Lawyer 52(1)1-45 (2019). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
On January 20, 2021, President Biden suspended MPP, and DHS terminated the policy on June 1, 2021. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
We’re pleased to say that nothing came of that 2007 article. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
” Concurrence at *1. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm
§2. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm
The majority relies on two primary sources: (1) a Supreme Court opinion that doesn’t once reference the statute this panel is interpreting, and (2) a non-precedential dissent from denial of certiorari written by a justice who wasn’t in the majority on the opinion in #1. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Because they’re banks, that’s why… and these days, banks and fraud are like bees and honey, don’t you know. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Supp. 2d 1 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Government surveillance powers and practices are often justified with reference to other national security concerns and threats like terrorism, as this House brief on the FISA re-authorization illustrates. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
These royalties ranged from 1% to 5% of the chip price, depending on sales volume. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Instead, Rothman’s brief wet out to make three narrow points: (1) courts should not rely upon strict statistical significance testing for admissibility determinations; (2) peer review is not an appropriate touchstone for the validity of an expert witness’s opinion; and (3) unpublished, non-peer-reviewed “reanalysis” of studies is a routine part of the scientific process, and regularly practiced by epidemiologists and other scientists. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Under the current version of Rule 26(a)(2)(B), the scope of required disclosure in the expert report has been narrowed in some respects. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Importantly, the Terms: (1) purport to bind any entity that has an ownership interest in the goods; and (2) include a forum selection provision selecting the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
To be sure, sometimes the retraction comes after an obscene delay, with the authors kicking and screaming.[1] Sometimes the retraction comes at the request of the authors, better late than never.[2] Retractions in the biomedical journals, whether voluntary or not, are on the rise.[3] The process and procedures for retraction of articles often lack transparency. [read post]
