Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 161 - 180
of 29,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 1:12 pm
MARK STEYN on the San Francisco Chronicle: "There is no explanation for the Chronicle's action if they're in the newspaper business (ie, in attracting readers, selling copies, etc.). [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:18 am
In re Silberberg and Silberberg, Serial No. 78712155 (July 24, 2007) [not precedential].The Board disagreed with the Examining Attorney's contention that "it is the wording in applicant's mark that necessarily is the dominant feature of the mark's commercial impression. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:01 am
Today, we’re bringing you another episode of our Arbiters of Truth series on the online information ecosystem. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:12 pm
You’re asking for flack in spades. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
In re Chatam Int’l Inc., 380F.3d 1340, 1342 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 6:16 am
Once you start looking, you'll "notice" that they're everywhere: Myriad signs with odd and unnecessary quotation marks. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:32 am
All need to re-think the business and operational model. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:17 am
In re Dana Limited, Serial No. 85447797 (January 30, 2014) [precedential].Applicant Dana admitted that its mark contained a "phantom" element, but argued that the mark should still be registered because (1) it is the legal equivalent of Applicant's prior registered marks, (2) the mark is "limited" in accordance with prior case law, and (3) PTO practice allows such a registration.Dana's prior registrations covered the diamond design, or the design plus the… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Congress is returning from spring break this week, and at least in the Senate they’re wasting no time getting down to business. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ This ruling is consistent with the TTAB's In re Brown decision from earlier in the year, wherein the TTAB affirmed the refusal to grant federal registration to a mark used for the retail sale of herbs that included marijuana on the basis of lacking lawful use. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 3:06 am
The government's idea seemed to be that this would ensure cheap designer clothes for the masses, who would then re-elect it. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:21 am
In a rather significant development in the TTAB's fraud jurisprudence, the Board has re-designated as precedential its decision in Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
Unless you’re a patent attorney, you probably do not pay much attention to these, so why are these on products? [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:29 am
Mark thinks much of the present will be the future, but with re-imagination of the present. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Cipriani v Cipriani [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) established the following principles:is the use in accordance with honest practices (inc. a duty to act fairly re the trade mark owner's interests)? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
In re GO & Assocs., LLC, No. 2022-1961, 2023 U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
In re GO & Assocs., LLC, No. 2022-1961, 2023 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
In re Urbano, 51 U.S.P.Q.2d 1776 (T.T.A.B. 1999). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
In response to Mark Medice's post - Yes, it is past time for law firms to re-think expenses. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
The EUTM proprietor did not provide arguments explaining why it re-filed an identical mark for goods and services which were identical to some of the goods and services already covered by its earlier registration.Taking into account all the factual circumstances, the Cancellation Division concluded that the filing of the application of the contested EUTM, insofar as it included the goods and services already covered by an earlier EUTM registration, was made without any commercial… [read post]
