Search for: "In re Marriage of King" Results 161 - 180 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
 As the Wall Street Journal noted in its editorial this morning, what will become of the couple that marries in Hawaii while working for the United States government, only to be re-assigned by the government to a state that does not recognize marriages between same sex individuals? [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:55 am by Meg Kribble
The Royal Marriages Act of 1772 specified that: No descendant of his late Majesty, [King George II] (other than the issue of princesses married, or who may marry into foreign families) shall be capable of contracting matrimony without the previous consent of his Majesty, his heirs, &c. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:59 am by Lovechilde
Immigration reform, marriage equality and the advancement of equal opportunity may appear to many as issues that have minimal overlap. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 September 16, 2021  Appellate Division, First Department Disposition of prior petition to terminate mother parental rights which was favorable to the biological mother, did not preclude the findings of extraordinary circumstances in later kinship guardianship proceeding. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:36 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"King's Speech Becomes PG-13 by Muting F-Word" http://bit.ly/dGTxVK finally! [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
”  Other commentary focuses on the Court’s anticipated decision in King v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Leopando, 449 NE 2d 137 – Ill: Supreme Court 1983 If something in a divorce is not ruled upon, nothing about that divorce can be appealed. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
In 2011, the Obama administration announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Frank Cranmer
” As to using AI for legal blogging, all we can say (if you’ll pardon the cliché) is that we’re neither of us getting any younger – so who knows? [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
No one, including the king (and thereafter the state) had power to usurp or interfere with the enjoyment by the people of their rights, customs and privileges unless lawfully entitled. [read post]