Search for: "In re P. I. (1989)" Results 161 - 180 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
See White Collar Crime: Fifth Survey of Law-Immunity, 26 Am.Crim.L.Rev. 1169, 1179 & n. 62 (1989) (hereafter “Immunity”). [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
If I am then I agree with Mr Dean that the court has to conduct a pure, fact-specific Re S balancing exercise. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
  In re Article 26 and the Health (Amendment) (No.2) Bill 2004 and O’Donoghue v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
A detailed calculation reveals that the likelihood that such a substantial departure from the expected value would occur by chance is less than I in 10140. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Under the terms of §157(b)(2)(C), the bankruptcy court had statutory authority to enter Final Rulings on the Smith counterclaim to the Pierce Proof of Claim.The bankruptcy court could also enter Final Rulings on the Pierce Proof of Claim because: (i) although Pierce claimed that the Pierce Proof of Claim involved a “personal injury tort” which the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to hear under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:32 pm by lawmrh
And then there was the unforgettable and unbelievable case of In re Lamb (1989) 49 Cal. 3d 239 [260 Cal. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:49 am by Matt Cameron
” In Re Bushkin Associates, 864 F2d 241 (1st Cir. 1989)(Selya, J.) [read post]