Search for: "In re R. S. (1985)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It is also available in Kindle ebook editions and electronic editions at the Joel R. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
 Other works included Kahil Gibran’s "The Prophet", Virginia Woolf’s "Jacob’s Room", Agatha Christie’s "The Murder on the Links", Marcel Proust’s "The Prisoner" (La Prisonnière, vol. 5 of In Search of Lost Time), William Carlos Williams’s "The Great American Novel", H. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
Consequently they are not subject to the provisions of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 3:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Not only is there the unlawful eviction damages point (and some clarity on why they were made against the party), but also interesting findings on damages for breach of fitness for habitation (not the new s.9A Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but the old obligation for furnished lettings, but the points still stand). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
The dot-org domain extension was established as one of the first top-level domains in 1985 alongside dot-com, dot-net and a handful of others. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:29 am by bcuban
When I first started practicing law in 1985, no lawyer I knew had a computer. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am by Arnie Clarke
A priority application was filed in 1984, followed by a wider filing programme in 1985. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
It therefore denies the motion to dismiss Frese's void-for-vagueness claim…. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm by Giles Peaker
(All of the criminal penalties for not providing information in the L&TA 1985 are similarly nonsense – most notably the offence under s.25 of not providing details of the invoices behind the service charge under s.23). [read post]