Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
Judge Cicconetti obviously thinks they're right. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:58 am
Judge Scott Gwin dissented on this point, agreeing with the trial court that the signing bonus is passive income under R.C. 3105.171(B)(4), and thus solely Kuhn’s separate property. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
ODNR regulatory news:NOTICE TO WELL OWNERS re: tubular goods (3/31/2015)—The requirements of R.C. 1509.16 became effective March 31, 2015. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
If the claimant dismisses the complaint before trial, there can be another year before the case is re-filed and yet another year before the trial arrives. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
Nor is Blankenship entitled to the protections of In Re C.P., because he is not a juvenile. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 121.22 (Open Meetings Act.) [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Clark Case Syllabus, At a minimum, when questioning a child about suspected abuse in furtherance of a duty pursuant to R.C. 2151.421, a teacher acts in a dual capacity as both an instructor and as an agent of the state for law-enforcement purposes. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law The R.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Therefore, the court should not re-write the contract agreed to by Lewis and affirm the appellate court. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
The appeals court held that although the traffic stop was made in violation of R.C. 4513.39, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Once the safety bumper has collapsed, the car cannot operate until the bumper is reopened, the circuit is completed, and the system has been manually re-set. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Pfeifer declined to recuse himself, and voted against imposing the death penalty in the required re-sentencing in the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
”) In re Marks v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
In re Estate of Hutson, 165 Ohio St. 115, 133 N.E.2d 347 (1956). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
(R.C. 2317.421, construed.) [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
” In re M.D., 38 Ohio St.3d 149, 527 N.E.2d 286 (1988), syllabus. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
” Long will undoubtedly argue this on re-appeal. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
A mortgage holder has the right to redeem (take back) real property that is the subject of a real estate tax foreclosure when the owner does not pay taxes on the land, according to the recent decision of the Ohio Supreme Court in In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
The certified question is “whether civil liability is expressly imposed upon managers or supervisors under R.C. 4112.01(A)(2) for their individual violations of R.C. 4112.02(A) so that political subdivision immunity is lifted by R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(c). [read post]
