Search for: "In re Smith (1980)"
Results 161 - 180
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Discovery Beyond the Report and the Deposition The lesson of the cases interpreting Rule 26 is that counsel cannot count exclusively upon the report and automatic disclosure requirements to obtain the materials necessary or helpful for cross-examination of statisticians who have created their own analyses. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Smith (7th Cir. 1978); Tollett v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:36 pm
Actually, Theobald Smith, research-assistant to Dr. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:08 pm
We’re located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, California 90028. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Holocaust Memorial Council, from 1980 to 1982. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
It is a fact well known to certain Episcopalians—both those who have left the Episcopal Church (USA) and those who have remained—that ECUSA and its dioceses have followed a pattern of suing any church that chooses to leave for another Anglican jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Then the movement became bipartisan, as Congress tried to re-enact a broad presumptive exemption regime with RFRA and RLUIPA. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
But if you do believe in such counts, this is the count for RFRA and RLUIPA under the fairly conservative Supreme Court we have had since 1997. * * * Since we’re on this topic, let me mention a related claim that I’ve heard from some academics: that, at least in the 1960s to 1980s, “only Christians ever [won] free exercise cases” in the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Courtesy of Mike Imbroscio of Covington (who was on the winning team) today’s post is about a very satisfying Cymbalta win – not only did warning causation fail under the learned intermediary rule, but the warning for the drug was held adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Korn, a 1980’s case about emerging scientific understanding of the HIV virus, the court engages in an assessment of what the defendant ought to have known.[10] It goes so far as to cite specific articles in medical journals and debate whether or not the defendant was expected to have read these articles thus properly understanding the probability of harm resulting from his carelessness. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
They have a defibrillator on hand at the ball field, and one of our guys, Earl Smith, is a doctor. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In this five part series, originally published in the Summer 2014 edition of the Media Law Resource Center Bulletin,[1] we take an in-depth look at the native advertising phenomenon and the legal issues surrounding the practice. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:46 am
Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), Parker v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
App.3d 310, 314, 414 N.E.2d 850, 853 (5th Dist. 1980). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
See, e.g., Privacy Protection Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
When Willard’s widow sought to reopen his estate in order to exercise her statutory authority to waive the privilege for estate settlement purposes, the North Carolina Supreme Court, in In re Miller, 357 N.C. 316 (2003), found that her true purpose was not to effectuate the goals of the estate but to uncover information relevant to the murder investigation. [read post]
