Search for: "In re Wal*Mart Stores, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 9:16 am by Donna Boehme
Compliance Week reports that “Decision No. 1” of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
But Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has styled the website as something else – infringement upon its WALMART trademark. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 279 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013). [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by hlpronline
Anne King  As I wrote previously, as courts apply the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bone/Wal-Mart on error costs: source identification is expensive to determine, which I think the paper is clear about in struggling w/solutions. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
PLM’s products are distributed throughout various parts of the country and sold in “large club stores like Costco, supermarkets like WalMart, Hispanic grocery stores like El Super and Vallarta, drug stores like Walgreens, and a variety of other retail outlets. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm by Greg Mersol
  Many of the court’s reasons sprang from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
The Court’s Decision Plaintiffs’ theory of commonality was rejected by Judge Kessler as identical to the failed theory presented in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:42 am
In re Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc., Serial Nos. 85389360 and 85389763 (May 30, 2014) [not precedential]Wal-Mart teaches us that product configurations can never be inherently distinctive. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:49 am by Andrew Trask
The court also pointed out that–contrary to the requirements of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]