Search for: "In the Matter of K. H." Results 161 - 180 of 1,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A statement was provided by Mr H. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:30 am by sandylaw
L a s t w e e k , t h e J u s t i c e D e p a r t m e n t charged three higher ranking Credit Suisse executives of lying to American regulators about the infractions andadvisingU.S.residents tonottakepartinanIRSamnestyprogram aimedattaxviolators. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:33 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
, February 2, 2011)During litiation, Jackson Hewitt (JH) challenged numerous patents asserted by H&R Block, alleging that they were directed to non-statutory subject matter, and thus unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:24 am by South Florida Lawyers
The Judge is not done:That is why premium-rate lawyers who work at large high-powered law firms like H&K exist. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am by Sharon L. Lippett
 Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am by Sharon L. Lippett
 Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:13 am by Sharon L. Lippett
 Additionally, Items 4(k) and 5(b) of Part IV on Schedule H and Item 4(j) of Part II on Schedule I ask if any assets were transferred to another plan. [read post]
19 May 2010, 9:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Filed under: Corporate Compliance, Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Fiduciary Responsibility, Retirement Plans, Uncategorized Tagged: 401(k) Plan, defined contribution plan, employer securities, ERISA, Fiduciary Responsibility, Retirement Plans [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:45 pm
§ 362(h) or (k) are strict liability statutes. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If what is meant is (as understood by the ED in the present case) that there is no modification whatsoever of any other feature of the embodiment, than the condition is trivial and almost never fulfilled (for instance, when a different water level sensor is used […]).[2.9] Therefore, contrary to the opinion of the ED (and of the [applicant]), the Board considers the “three point or essentiality test” (cf. the Guidelines H-V 3.1 and H-V 3.2.1 (June 2012 edition))… [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:01 am by Kelly
Despite reports all over the web announcing talks of a merger, H&R Block has refused to comment publicly on the matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, according to A 84, the claims must define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:04 pm
Even other marriage based visas (K-1/fiance or CR-1/marriage can take many months and a substantial amount of paperwork. [read post]