Search for: "Inquiry Concerning A Judge" Results 161 - 180 of 4,922
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Kevin Frazier
Supreme Court, however, has hinted at a third inquiry: “the practical abilities and limitations of juries. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm by Neil Siegel
IV, § 4.But what do concerns about consequences have to do with the LAW? [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Not because of the "history and tradition" of "analogous" firearms restrictions circa 1791, the inquiry required by the 2022 SCOTUS decision in NYS Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:39 am by Marcia Coyle
A number of federal judges have voiced frustration with the history and tradition test. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Cole concurred but added: To be clear, purposeful availment is satisfied here because of Griffin's direct communications with VisuWell about Johnson's employment, but the ever-changing mechanics of social media platforms might make this inquiry in other cases more difficult. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Reimposes Restrictions on Trump’s Speech in Jan. 6 Case MSN – Rachel Weiner and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 10/29/2023 A federal judge reimposed limits on Donald Trump’s public statements in advance of his trial on charges of conspiring to subvert the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:49 am by David Pocklington
Review Group membership: Sir Mark Hedley (Chair) – Mark has practised Law for 50 years as Barrister, Circuit Judge and High Court Judge and now teacher. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
The court granted rehearing en banc, but later vacated the order as improvidently granted over the dissents of five judges. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:40 am by Guest Blogger
  In a case of this kind, Bruen calls for a “more nuanced approach” to analogical reasoning where gun regulation responds to “unprecedented societal concerns or dramatic technological changes. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Any link to the adult industry was peripheral at most and the publications were therefore of no, or very limited, public concern. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
Often referred to as the concept of legal ethics, these considerations can be written, unwritten, informal or formal, or even codified into rules which govern or guide the behavior of legal professionals including attorneys and judges.[2] Given the distinct and specialized realm of art law, it comes as no surprise that this profession frequently confronts distinctive ethical and legal inquiries. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
The effect of all these changes upon our system of constitutional law is surely an interesting and important matter for legal inquiry. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:41 am by Christopher J. Hubbert
Turkish Inquiry and Repatriation Efforts In 2009 and 2010, the Consul General for the Republic of Türkiye asked CMA for information concerning 21 objects in the museum’s collection, including the statue. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:51 am by Holly Buckley
Currently, any appeal of ORI findings of research misconduct and administrative actions requires a complete review — and hearing — by an administrative law judge (ALJ). [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Rares J dissented, upholding the primary judge’s refusal of a stay (FCAFC, [96]). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by CFM Admin
The proposed rules reflect the SEC’s primary concern that PDA technologies may produce biased data or suggest biased [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
In light of the foregoing, Judge Hey concluded that the certification provided by defense counsel in connection with its original document production was unreasonable under Rule 26(g) for failing to conduct the appropriate inquiry as to the defendant’s email data. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
In light of the foregoing, Judge Hey concluded that the certification provided by defense counsel in connection with its original document production was unreasonable under Rule 26(g) for failing to conduct the appropriate inquiry as to the defendant’s email data. [read post]