Search for: "JAS v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
McColl JA dissented. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:55 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:45 pm
"); Yoon Ja Kim v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
They are Snell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Bhd. and its affiliate Vina Cell Technology Company Limited and Vina Solar Technology Company Limited; JA Solar (Malaysia) Co., Ltd. or JA Solar Malaysia Sdn. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
JA 74.5 K55 2011 Public passion : rethinking the grounds for political justice Rebecca Kingston. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
JA 15a. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO review of UDRP disputes - record number of complaints handled by WIPO in 2008 (WIPO) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Goverment outlines new creative industries’ Digital Rights Agency proposed in Digital Britain report (Out-Law) (IP finance) (Intellectual… [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 8:13 am
I suppose I have to quote the BCCA 's (sometimes iconoclastic) Southin JA, again, In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:39 am
Ja es, 2023 Ga. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
JAS Family Trust v Oceana Holding Corp., 109 AD3d 639; Matter of Niggli v Richlin Mach., 257 AD2d 623; Matter of Marcato, 102 AD2d 826). [read post]
