Search for: "Jackson v. People of State of California" Results 161 - 180 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
But it would be a risky mistake to dismiss or ignore this latest gambit.Even so, we should not miss the elements of a head-spinning flip-flop that have accompanied this move.In May, following the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health opinion, Graham praised its embrace of states’ rights.As he put it at the time, “If the Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
California: Defense attorney must follow through on appeal after conviction. 1967 United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by NCC Staff
Roosevelt directed the military to isolate any citizen, if needed, from a 60-mile-wide coastal area from Washington state to California and extending inland into southern Arizona. [read post]
For example, Michael Jackson was unsuccessfully charged and tried for crimes by the State of California, only to be sued in a civil suit by the family of an individual who claimed he had been abused by the pop icon. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But the Court’s religiosity also emerges in nominally non-religion controversies, including Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am by Mike Scarcella
In California, prosecutors are going after a $30 million house and Michael Jackson memorabilia, among other items. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mitchell, No. 06-516 Conviction for aggravated identity theft is reversed where defendant did not couple his use of the name "Marcus Jackson" a sufficient amount of correct, distinguishing information to identify a specific Marcus Jackson, as required by the statute. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]