Search for: "James v. Jane"
Results 161 - 180
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm
In Sorrell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Forman, James. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Jane Chong summarized a decision requiring that videos of Guantanamo detainees being force fed need to be released publicly. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am
At Foreign Policy, James Stavridis, the former supreme allied commander of NATO, has 7 pieces of advice for creating a durable confederation of states. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
Later on Tuesday, Kerr summarized the CA2 ACLU v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Following the recent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc by the detainees in the Allaithi v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
See Won Jin Lee, Aaron Blair, Jane A. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
Jane Chong highlighted two amicus briefs submitted separately by the Center for National Security Studies and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of the Nation’s Capital in support of appellees in Klayman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
James M. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
” Jane Chong summarized the case. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
In Aldrich, v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 3:36 pm
Basile v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
And after the Supreme Court granted cert in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
In Guantanamo news, Jane noted the DC Circuit’s affirmation of the district court’s denial of Abdullah’s motion to enjoin the U.S. government from detaining him in Abdullah v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Jane followed up with a close analysis arguing that the true significance of the case lay in its expansion of habeas jurisdiction asserted by the courts in Boumediene v. [read post]
