Search for: "Jefferson et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 11:35 am
A post yesterday described this new redistricting dispute (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Jefferson County Commission, et al. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Texas et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
KEITH LOWELL, ET AL. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am
Texas (pre-order) Kopel, Aiming for Liberty: The Past, Present, And Future of Freedom and Self-Defense Post, In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace Volokh, Academic Legal Writing: Law Review Articles, Student Notes, Seminar Papers, and Getting on Law Review UPDATE: Note that I didn’t include casebooks, treatises, and hornbooks in this list, because, e.g., who really wants to get Bernstein et al., The New Wigmore: Expert and Scientific… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm
” Matthew Barbabella et al., Insider Trading in Congress: The Need for Regulation, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1318682. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
., et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Merrill et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century, no. 7, 121 (2004). [2] See id. at 7. [3] U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
The notion of letting Darrell Steinberg et al. choose California's senators is positively appalling. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
There are posts about the decision, inter alia, Thomas Jefferson Center site and on the SCOTUS Blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Biogen et al (CAFC 2006-1634, -1649) precedential; Judges Rader (chiming in), Newman (author), Moore (dissent) The three patents contain a total of 230 claims. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
The conclusion of the CAFC in Classen v Biogen, et al [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm
Aug. 26, 2011)(per curiam opinion)(grant of more relief than requested, finality and partial summary judgment, harmful error analysis, exception to rule that ground must be stated in the summary judgment motion)G & H TOWING COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:47 am
The leading case on this subject is Dendrite Int’l, Inc. v John Doe, No. 3, et al., 342 N.J. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Hard to believe that grown adults are so willing to substitute their judgment, formed from the know-nothing talking heads on Fox, MSNBC, CNN, et al, for the considered judgment of 12 regular people who heard ALL of the admissable evidence and deliberated as a body to reach it's verdict. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
NAACP of Austin, et al., No. 09-0420 (DB). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
The Ninth Circuit’s Recent Brantley Decision Brantley, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:05 pm
., et al., No. 10-0245 (DB) This was a certified question from the federal Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:00 am
Hilliard, et al. decision. [read post]
