Search for: "John Doe 1-17"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2021, 10:35 am
"At The Lectern's weekly report on petitions for review notes the granting of (1) a petition filed ten days late and (2) a petition filed by a pro per. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
While we do not yet know, it seems likely that he is relying on New York Election Law Section 17-152, which prohibits any conspiracy “to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
’ 42 U.S .Code § 16911(1). . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
Stack of index cards of 1-liners. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:55 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:58 am
Does that hurt, o fellow conlawprofs? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Idaho (3), Michigan (1), Montana (2), Utah (1), and Washington (10). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:02 am
_uacct = "UA-1069395-1"; urchinTracker(); [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:08 am
Minemyer, 1-09-cv-03820 (ILND December 17, 2010, Order) (Dow, J.) [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
Her pre-trial date is scheduled for December 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:38 pm
For more information about driving under the influence charges, suspended license charges and traffic tickets in San Rafael, Mill Valley and throughout the San Francisco Bay Area, or for a free consultation, call Marin County DUI attorney John Stanko at 415-755-8899, or toll free at 1-877-204-8900. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 2:41 pm
November 2016 | John G. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
Practice Tip #2: The Copyright Act does not protect general ideas, but only the particular expression of an idea. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
John Elwood briefly reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
This means that a Section 17(b) violation does not require a finding of fault (such as negligence or tortious intent). [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 4:38 pm
For example, ‘‘ 1983 John Doe" (17 U.S.C. 401) and ‘‘*M* John Doe" (17 U.S.C. 909) would be properly limited and, under current statutes, legally sufficient notices of copyright and mask work, respectively. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Decir "un John Doe" es como decir "un Juan Pérez". [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
See 17 C.F.R. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:31 am
Check out this good article about the National Enquirer's pursuit of the John Edwards adultery story. [read post]
