Search for: "Johnson v. True" Results 161 - 180 of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
” Brenda contended Ryan’s allegations “fail[ed] to meet the high burden required for a change of custody” because none of them, “even if true, constitute[d] a material and substantial change in circumstances. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Applying the “unique” Pennsylvania independence source rule, and pending two years before it was decided, is Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 10:44 am by Jon Sands
The same is true here for 2111 robbery. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
The case is Scholz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
However, if the judge found that TFL's decision was not unlawful, it would stand. True, says the IPKat, this isn't a copyright case -- but it raises all sorts of issues. [read post]
  The claims against the remaining defendants, including Johnson & Johnson and Merck, are slated for trial starting later this year. [read post]