Search for: "Jonathan David Miller"
Results 161 - 180
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
The biggest problem with the Supreme Court’s affirmative action case law over the last four decades is the lack of candor (some would say dishonesty) in the way the Court discusses the constitutional limits on government’s ability to use race. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volume [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
With the president and the Senate staking out their relative positions concerning the Supreme Court vacancy created by Antonin Scalia’s death, Americans need to understand the basic ground rules of the judicial appointments game. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Miller (1939), a majority of the Kansas state senate brought suit to challenge the actions of the state executive branch in connection with the ratification of a proposed federal constitutional amendment dealing with child labor. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
., EVP, Related Cos.Jonathan Rose, President, Jonathan Rose CompaniesDottie Herman, CEO, Prudential Douglas EllimanPatrick Hanlon, Principal, Ackman-ZiffFred Harris, SVP Development, AvalonBayRalph Herzka, President & CEO, Meridian Capital GroupMike Edelman, Managing Regional Director, Freddie MacChip Walters, Principal, Prudential Real Estate InvestorsStephen N. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the important Supreme Court cases currently being briefed (with oral argument set for March), Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
About a month ago I wrote an essay for this website commenting on the drop in bar passage rates in many states in the fall of 2014. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the important Supreme Court cases currently being briefed (with oral argument set for March), Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:28 pm
We missed the first but made the second, with Handel's music echoing in the background.Best not-quite opera: The Jonathan Miller production of Bach's St. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 10:08 am
Department of State; Marshall Miller, principal associate deputy attorney general at the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I continue to analyze what will—and what should—happen to California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, in the wake of the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I offer some quick analysis of the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In the same-sex marriage cases that were heard and decided by the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In an essay for this website a few weeks ago, my fellow columnist and friend Mike Dorf wrote about how the Obamacare statute (Act) might be in danger in the King v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The year that is winding down brought many legal twists and turns at the highest levels of the federal government, and 2018 promises to be just as legally interesting and important. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
When doctors consider whether to administer a particular medical treatment, they have to balance the treatment’s efficacy (that is, how likely the treatment is to help the patient, and by how much) against negative side effects (that is, how likely the treatment is to harm the patient, and how badly). [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
From the Right and from the Left, legislatures are considering—and in many cases enacting—laws that have no meaningful chance of surviving judicial challenge under the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In my last column, 2020 Election Legal Maneuvering, I described a recent lawsuit filed by some prominent lawyers and law professors challenging Texas’s use of the so-called Winner-Take-All (WTA) approach to selecting the state’s representatives to the so-called Electoral College. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Legal and political commentators have already spent thousands of hours on how best to understand Justice Alito’s majority opinion in Burwell v. [read post]
