Search for: "Joseph v. King" Results 161 - 180 of 341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Judge King in Marya v Warner/Chapell Music determined that the copyright filed by Summy Co. in 1935 granted the rights to the specific piano arrangements of the music, not the music itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
Writing for the Court, the Chief Justice in King v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At the Petri-Flom Center’s Bill of Health Blog, Gregory Lipper weighs in on comments by Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz criticizing Chief Justice John Roberts’s vote in King v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
A Bronx Probate Lawyer that a Summary judgment may be granted only when it is clear that no triable issue of fact exists (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986];Phillips v Joseph Kantor & Co., 31 NY2d 307, 311 [1972]). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Several early Czech kings maintained their royal seat in the fortress, which, other than a few restored sections, is largely in ruins. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
” At The Hill, Timothy Jost discusses the possible consequences if the Court were to hold in King v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
, Matteo Dragoni, University of Pavia (Italy)III.B        Of Elites and their Influence·         On Legal Elites and the Legal Profession in Cyprus, Nikitas Hatzimihail, University of Cyprus (Cyprus)·         Anglo-Phone Legality: Ciceronian, Socratic and Derridian, Joseph P. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am by Amy Howe
” In The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers whether, if the Court rules for the plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]