Search for: "Kessler v. Kessler" Results 161 - 180 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
  Indeed, a Kessler-era FDA over-reach (one of many) in this direction having to do with medical devices is why Congress added §396 to the FDCA in the first place.That’s changing. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jones, University of Wisconsin, “The Other Operation Dixie: PublicEmployees and the New Deal Order”David Bensman, Rutgers University, and Donna Kesselman, University of Paris, EstCreteil, “From the New Deal Standard Employment Relationship to EmploymentGrey Zone”Commentator and Chair: Bob Master, Communications Workers of AmericaThe Politics of Regulation In and Beyond the New Deal Order Paul Sabin, Yale University, “Environmental Law and the End of the New Deal… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As noted, this doctrine originated in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kessler v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Amy Howe
There’s still more commentary on King v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
Kessler, 614 P.2d 94 (Or. 1980) (billy clubs); Barnett v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane noted that the appellees in Klayman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
However, the Superior Court decided in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This argument is foreclosed by the mother having taken a contrary position before Supreme Court when she affirmatively opposed the father's pretrial motion for the appointment of an attorney for the child as in Mikkelson v Kessler, Maas v Cornell Univ. [read post]