Search for: "Kirkland v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
  The report often states facts in a way that implies the bicycle rider was at-fault or at-least partially at fault for the bicycle v. car collision. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:20 am by James Bickford
  For UPI, Michael Kirkland examines the issues in Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: Although this month’s debt ceiling crisis was ultimately averted, Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses the Court’s 1935 decision in Perry v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses the prospect that today’s Court might overrule Griswold v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
” Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses the Court’s recent cert. grant in the national security and surveillance case of Clapper v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
At UPI, Michael Kirkland reports on a proposed Securities and Exchange Commission regulation designed to “undo at least some of the effects” of the Court’s opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Thomas, who is representing himself, cited a 1987 Georgia Supreme Court case known as Cherry v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:37 am by Lyle Denniston
Kirkland, et al. (10-222). ** A challenge to the constitutionality of a state law imposing a business revenue tax on nightclubs that offer nude dancing entertainment. [read post]