Search for: "LEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 161 - 180
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Lee, by Bethany R. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
His conclusion:The majority view held by the Nation’s district courts that have considered the question join Weddle v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:31 pm
Lee, No. 2013-1160, -1179 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- In an opinion issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit affirmed a determination by the District Court for the District of Columbia that challenges of patent term adjustment (PTA) determinations by the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, has ruled in Klayman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:53 am
In today’s case (Lee v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
District Court for the District of Columbia 2013). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 11:19 am
By David Worley In Lee v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
Saul Cornell and Nathan Kozuskanich's edited volume, The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
He became incensed with blogger Lee Stranahan. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 261 (1982).) [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Feder v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
Bush, (2008), District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
The other case cited by the epidemiology chapter was the District of Columbia Circuit’s review of an EPA risk assessment of second-hand smoke. [read post]
