Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 8,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 For more information including ways to reduce your exposure, see www.P65Warnings.ca.gov/acrylamide In response to public comments, the OEHHA stated that the new warning label incorporates suggested elements from the district court’s opinion in CalChamber v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:53 am by New York Criminal Defense
Early last week the Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the First Department which held that the rule of law announced in People v Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, 132 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2015]) -- a decision I had labeled a "huge success for the criminal defense bar" in an October blog post.In People v Catu, the New York Court of Appeals held that the court must advise a defendant of the post-release… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:35 am by Roy F Harmon III
“It is not the label placed on a state law claim that determines whether it is preempted, but whether in essence such a claim is for the recovery of an ERISA plan benefit. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 12:41 am by Ben Vernia
Many pharmaceutical companies are watching with interest the suit by Allergan against the FDA for an order permanently enjoining the United States from enforcing the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act against the company for providing information to physicians regarding an off-label use of the company’s blockbuster drug, Botox. [read post]