Search for: "Levy v State" Results 161 - 180 of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
The district court order stated that “the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation”; Levy’s post states that Ruddie is in the final stages of plea bargaining with the United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island; we understand that his obligations will extend to getting phony consent orders lifted in two dozen other cases besides those involving Myvesta. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:24 am by Heather Wallace
The state high court’s August 22 decision not to review the case leaves unchanged the April 14 appeals court ruling in Vergara v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Similarly, the originally private nature of the resources did not prevent them being regarded as State resources within the meaning of Art. 87(1) EC (see, to that effect, Case T‑358/94 Air France v Commission [1996]).In accordance with the case-law, the mere fact that a subsidy scheme benefiting certain economic operators in a given sector was wholly or partially financed by contributions imposed by the public authority and levied on the undertakings concerned was… [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:25 am by Agrilawyer
Varieties protected by Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Title V can be sold only as a class of certified seed as will be designated by the individual states. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  Thus, even though the due process or Commerce Clause standards may not be identical or coterminous, when considering whether a state may levy a tax there are significant parallels between the two standards. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm by Sme
Utah State Charter School Board (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board because its members were entitled to qualified immunity)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jackson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
The Revenue Act of 1864 did survive a later Supreme Court challenge, when in Springer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am by Kevin Kaufman
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
The case challenges the right of a state to levy a business activity tax on an out-of-state corporation which has no physical presence in the state. [read post]