Search for: "Light v. Light" Results 161 - 180 of 41,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For instance, in its judgment on reparations of February 2022 in the case “Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
  (For more on false light, check out this post.) [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Recalling firefighters on General Municipal Law Section 207-a disability leave to report for light duty Cohoes v Local 2562, IAFF, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686Barnes v Council 82 [Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719What is the proper procedure for a municipal employer to a call disabled firefighter or police officer back to work for a light duty assignment? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
The light pole was owned by the City of Chicago, who was then the defendant in the Illinois personal injury lawsuit brought as a result of Noni's injuries; Noni Brown, a minor v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:13 am
The Missouri Court of Appeals is remanding a false light case and may allow it to proceed in Meyerkord v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Butamax Advanced Fuels LLC and Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 3:05 am
In the case (out of the Supreme Court of California), FRANCES T. v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:03 am
Blue lights alone is not a seizure, although it is usually indicative of one. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:19 am
As a new Ontario Superior Court ruling sheds light on the challenges of getting legal aid representation in southwestern parts of the province, Legal Aid Ontario is defending its record in the face of tight funding circumstances.The ruling came in R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]