Search for: "Lord v. Smith"
Results 161 - 180
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:22 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Rix and Patten and Mr Justice Peter Smith) dismissed the appeal.Intercontinental Brands had argued that only products which have a cachet should be protectable and that vodka, being a generic term, did not possess such a cachet. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm
The White Paper (Harm V.1) left harm undefined, which would have empowered Ofcom to write an alternative statute book to govern online speech. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Y, the defendant in X v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm
On 26 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke… [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
The House of Lords approved Powell in J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
The two types of investigation are distinct; notably Lord Bingham’s comments in Amin referred only to investigations in which the enhanced obligation was triggered. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
” McIvor at 32 (quoting Lord Nimmo Smith). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
At the Court of Appeal, the issue was whether the previous court of appeal judgment in Smith v Evans [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 (actually Smith v Buckland, but continually cited here as Evans) could be considered as still standing after the decisions in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 (our post on Doherty here). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 3:42 am
R -v- Davina Smith Sentencing Remarks by His Honour Judge Radfordat Snaresbrook Crown Court - 2 February 2007 It is my baleful duty now to sentence you for the 4 offences of Causing Death by Careless Driving, when unfit through Drugs of which you were found Guilty by the jury who tried you and the offence of Aggravated Vehicle Taking to which previously you had pleaded Guilty upon arraignment. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:50 am
In a rare move, Reed Smith filed a brief on its own behalf — and for two of its clients — telling the Supreme Court how crucial the case of Textron v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
He is a simple Kat who has never felt that a complex test is needed and he mourns the passage of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 -- a decision that seems to be floating in a sort of precedental limbo, no longer authoritative but still worthy enough to cite. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
