Search for: "MATTER OF N V"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
Gomez, 319 S.W.3d 638, 642 n.4 (Tex. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
And that, in turn, is still, more or less, grounded n the nation of the contractual nature of international law, and the aspirational nature of international norms. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
In Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that, but for the attorney’snegligence, she would have prevailed in the underlying matter, or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages ( Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [ pt Dept 2005]). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:12 am
The last episode of this story is the judgment delivered by the General Court on 21 February 2024 in Case T-361/21, Papouis Dairies Ltd (and others) v the European Commission. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:25 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
What the Supreme Court did in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm
This marks a huge difference vis-à-vis the dictum of the General Court, not only in this case, but also in the SRB v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Ass’n, 544 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Supp. 3d 521, 531 & n.56 (S.D.N.Y.2021) (same); Doe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
First, for the moment, no copyright claim has persuaded a court that licensing is required to avoid infringing the rights of copyright holders in scanned/scraped works used to train AI models.[3] And no US court has yet ruled against the argument that such use of content to train AI models is protected by fair use principles, which permit use of a protected work to create transformative new works.[4] Second, as a practical matter, the economic forces propelling the growth… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am
We thus turn to the “plain language of the statute” as “the clearest indicator of legislative intent” (Matter of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC v DeBellis, 32 NY3d 594, 607 [2018]). [read post]
