Search for: "MATTER OF R S P N J S P"
Results 161 - 180
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
We see the same in International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 pm
Sánchez-Pinilla, P. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for the plaintiffs, but the Supreme Court reversed, finding that the evidence was not sufficient to support a meeting of the minds of the parties on the matter of the annual salary, and ordered that the nurses take nothing. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Apr. 26, 2019).While the resolution of the case pivots on issues of contract law in the leasing context, the lengthy portion of the opinion addressing the matter of attorneys fees [see cut & pasted below] will have much broader impact across a wide array of practice areas. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Roy J. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Note also that Godoy opinion does not address the matter of contractual choice of law. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
” The Michael Geist blog has a post “Does Canadian Privacy Law Matter if it Can’t be Enforced? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
For now, and for English speakers, the Court's conclusion is especially interesting (rendered here in rough English): VII. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Regarding attorney's fees, the parties' lease agreement provided for a fee-shifting arrangement whereby "the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award for its reasonable attorneys' fees" from the non-prevailing party "[i]n any action to enforce the terms of [the] Lease. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
R. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Society’s values have not changed fundamentally just because it’s an Internet page. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
The dissent below notes the injunction's overbreadth: "[P]otential harmless posts . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Judges cannot escape that current any more than other mortals.Benjamin N. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 10:33 am
Muir Watt, N. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Two prominent pathologists weighed: “Whether an increased lung cancer risk also exists in the absence of asbestosis is a matter of considerable debate (177). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Peter N. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
A court’s authority to compel arbitration under the Act does not extend to all private contracts, no matter how emphatically they may express a preference for arbitration. [read post]
