Search for: "MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. King"
Results 161 - 180
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
Claimants who allege to be distributees of the decedent have the burden of proof on each of these elements (Matter of Cruz, NYLJ, Jan. 7, 2002, at 29, col 4 [Sur Ct, Kings County]; Matter of Balacich, NYLJ, Jan. 24, 1997 at 30, col 2 [Sur Ct, Kings County]). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Whalen v Whalen's Moving & Stor. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm
The case of Loomis v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
Repeat After Me: You May Not Expel a Member of a New York LLC Unless the Operating Agreement Says So
17 Sep 2018, 3:25 am
Peter Sherwood’s ruling last month in Matter of Goyal (Vintage India NYC, LLC), 2018 NY Slip Op 31926(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 7, 2018]. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
In Doeblin v MacArthur (2023 NY Slip Op 30133(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2023]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:34 am
The Mizrahi v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
Spellman (173 Misc 2d 979 [Sup Ct, NY County 1997]). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
§ 3162(a)(2); United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
______________DeCrescenzo v Gonzalez2007 NY Slip Op 09720Decided on December 11, 2007Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on December 11, 2007 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT A. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am
” [See the complete article for more detail on]: “The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]“ “Less than a month after Larsen, the Delaware Supreme Court, in Griffith v Stein (___A3d ___ [Del Aug. 16, 2022]“ “Trump’s Lawyers May Become Witnesses or Targets in Documents Investigation” — “Two lawyers for former President Donald J. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
See US Bank National Association, v Flatbush Extension LLC, et al., Index No. 26434/09. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
Josh is a huge fan of the 5-4 Bates v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am
” Court Denies Summary Judgment Concerning Disputed 10% Membership Interest in Brooklyn Restaurant Galarza v Galarza, 2020 NY Slip Op 33801(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 6, 2020]. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
United States, 408 U. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
If you answered these questions "no," you'll take comfort in a decision issued last week by Kings County Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in a case called Varveris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to various… [read post]
