Search for: "MATTER OF V R B" Results 161 - 180 of 8,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm by Michael Oykhman
R v Moyer held that section 182(b) does not apply to offering indignities to monuments per se, however, it does apply to offering indignities to monuments that mark human remains. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The Defence ToolkitThe Defence Toolkit – September 30, 2023 – “Ex Parte” This week’s top three summaries: R v MC, 2023 ONCA 611: right to #present, R v JDC, 2023 ABCA 255: s.715.1 #memory, and R v Harasiuk, 2023 ONCA 594: joint submission #sentencing. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
TX, R (On the Application Of) v Adur District Council (2022) EWHC 3340 (Admin) Adur’s allocation policy provided that only those resident in the borough for the last two years could join the housing register. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:11 pm by Russell Knight
R. 11(b) Petitions for emergency orders of protection are often the first filings between two parties. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v Butler held that material that is not obscene under this framework does not become so by reason of the person to whom it is shown, or the place of manner in which it is shown. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:00 am by Administrator
He was disbarred and ordered to pay costs, and the matter was referred to the Attorney General for possible criminal prosecution. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am by Norman L. Eisen
Meadows relates to protected political activity” (Corrected Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Charges Against Defendant Mark R. [read post]