Search for: "Majors v. Good" Results 161 - 180 of 17,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:07 am by Laura
This can provide a good starting point when thinking about what information should be provided, and when. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Even if one had good reason to believe that the ordinance aimed only at quiet, one still would likely conclude that it covers electric cars because, as Justice Scalia wrote for the Court in Oncale v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
A master account is also a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for an institution to have access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window, to incur intraday or overnight overdrafts in any of the Federal Reserve’s payment systems or to obtain direct membership in the major clearing networks that connect the U.S. payment system. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Lower court judges may wish to avoid reversal, and hence may view dicta that is clearly endorsed by the majority of a higher court as a good source of predictions about the likely decisions of that court in the future. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Alternatively, a court could choose to provide the supporting spouse a substantial majority of marital property in compensation. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Alternatively, a court could choose to provide the supporting spouse a substantial majority of marital property in compensation. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
Without the kind of means that Congress and the President have to enforce their decisions, the Court depends above all for its effectiveness on public confidence in its judgment.But whatever good the Statement and Code have done for public confidence in the Court will be more than undone if Justice Thomas participates in Trump v. [read post]