Search for: "March v. Municipal Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
Last time the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 5:55 pm
Ken has successfully handled over one thousand Municipal Court and Superior Court matters in the past 27 years. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
But the Court just agreed to hear a new case, Nieves v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
" The court explained that although a municipality may discipline an officer even if that officer is receiving General Municipal Law §207-c benefits, the statutory benefit may not be withheld without a pretermination evidentiary hearing. [read post]
Evidence fabrication claim is revived on appeal as Court of Appeals says trial court misled the jury
7 Apr 2021, 6:22 am
But a recent Supreme Court case, McDonough v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 9:56 pm
Lloyd, S-06-1113, 275 Neb. 205 The Supreme Court initially ruled that the City of Omaha could not prosecute him under the Omaha municipal code driving while intoxicated 2nd offense section because the municipal dwi code section was inconsistent with state law ( State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 6:36 am
LEXIS 85 (March 23, 2007): Based on these precepts, we agree with the motion judge that the Municipal Court judge should have recused himself from this warrant application proceeding. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 10:20 am
In Washington v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:11 am
The Municipal Court judge denied the motions to dismiss. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:14 pm
Connick v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:51 am
Martinetti v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 11:57 am
She pleaded guilty to DWLS in municipal court that March. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
" Citing Williams v City of New York, 64 NY2d 800, the court explaining that an administrative determination of a board or agency involving employee indemnification "may be set aside only if it lacks a factual [or legal] basis, and in that sense, is arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
In Bernstein v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Municipal Court, 116 Cal. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
Div., A-1928-08T3, March 18, 2010: Although tax returns are not privileged, in camera review is required before a court can compel their production. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
Div., A-2266-08T2, March 5, 2010: Orders setting child support, even those arising from a private agreement, “may be revised and altered by the court from time to time as circumstances may require. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:31 am
The same day Clifton was argued, the Court heard Moore v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
MILLER v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
Last term in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. [read post]