Search for: "Mark Toy" Results 161 - 180 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 2:49 am by Clément Monnet
In November 2006, Simba Toys, a German toy manufacturer and distributor wanting to sell a similar game, filed an application for a declaration of invalidity against this trade mark. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Howard Zaharoff
For these purposes you describe your business as "delivering games and toys to good little boys and girls as gifts for Christmas. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Howard Zaharoff
For these purposes you describe your business as "delivering games and toys to good little boys and girls as gifts for Christmas. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
With political will stoked by the recent lead-paint scares in children's toys, Congress is considering significantly expanding the role of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm by Dennis Crouch
  With regard to dilution, the appellate court found that the dog toy was not actually making commercial use of the JD mark. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am by Josh H. Escovedo
United Trademark Holdings, Inc. filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for use in conjunction with dolls and toy figures. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:38 am by Donald DePass
  It also includes recently approved methods for obtaining verifiable parental consent.The new guidance comes shortly after Senator Mark R. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
Allegedly, one may predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal, nine times out of ten, by simply looking at the marks and the identified goods or services. [read post]
9 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
In its decision, the General Court considered ‘gymnastic and sporting articles’ and ‘games and toys’ dissimilar for the purpose of likelihood of confusion assessment. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Kagan suggested that the toy was “an ordinary commercial product using a mark as a source identifier. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that VIP’s First Amendment interest in using Jack Daniel’s trademarks as its own marks on funny dog toys conferred special protection from infringement claims. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:18 pm
  The goods in the surviving "child" application all fall into the "merchandising" category (computer games; clothing; toys etc.). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm by Adam Zanjani
The registration of a red toy brick could hinder other toy manufacturers selling similar bricks to the market for better prices or providing better solutions to consumers. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  The artist who created a pet toy line is apparently quite angry that she’s not racking up gold coins from a lucrative license agreement for the mark ANGRY BIRDS with Rozio. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:55 am
This time, reports Technllama, it's to do with unauthorised use of Eros' SEXGEN trade mark. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The issue in the case came from a failure to file by Mattel:While Mattel was developing new toys, the USPTO cancelled the registrations for the CRASH DUMMIES marks on December 29, 2000, because Mattel did not file a section 8 declaration of use and/or excusable nonuse for the marks. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The issue in the case came from a failure to file by Mattel:While Mattel was developing new toys, the USPTO cancelled the registrations for the CRASH DUMMIES marks on December 29, 2000, because Mattel did not file a section 8 declaration of use and/or excusable nonuse for the marks. [read post]