Search for: "Mark Toy"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2022, 4:05 am
ECO-BRICKS Merely Descriptive of Toy Blocks? [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 11:27 am
In both the real world, and on Marvel Comic’s Earth 616, Intellectual Property Law can be a super weapon to inflict serious pain upon your enemies. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(a) refusal of the proposed mark US SPACE FORCE for a variety of goods in ten classes, including license plate frames, umbrellas, pillows, and toy spacecraft, finding that the mark falsely suggests a connection with the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:22 am
The district court found that VIP’s use of Jack Daniel’s trademarks to sell poop-themed dog toys was likely to confuse consumers, infringed Jack Daniel’s marks, and tarnished Jack Daniel’s reputation. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:04 pm
For example, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 mandates that the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s toy safety regulations refer to ASTM F963-17. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 3:33 am
[Opposition to registration of ECO-BRICKS for "toy building blocks" on the ground of Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness.] [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:50 pm
This included decals in Class 16; apparel items in Class 25; and toy foam novelty items in Class 28. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
The Trinity Legal Term ended on Friday 29 July 2022. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm
Also of note, 2022 marks SCDD’s return to its traditional July slot since 2019. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
As a result, trade mark registration would be available. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:15 pm
Always Stop at Crosswalks In both marked and unmarked crosswalks, bike riders are always required to yield to pedestrians like motor vehicles. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
The Polariod factors are: (1) the strength of the plaintiff’s mark; (2) the degree of similarity between the two marks; (3) the proximity of the products; (4) the likelihood that the owner will bridge the gap; (5) evidence of actual confusion; (6) defendant’s good faith in adopting the mark; (7) the quality of defendant’s product; and (8) the sophistication of the consumers. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Suggestion: forced position marks? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Distinctiveness=nature of mark, sort of thing that can be a mark. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:41 am
Again, the most I can say of Plaintiffs’ pleadings is that a consumer may be drawn to Jscout’s product because Plaintiffs have created consumer interest in a novel category of remote-control toy cars. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:03 am
The rush to file trade mark applications to capitalize on a trending term or phrase is not new. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Cir. 2002); see also Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:25 am
So when the court assesses strength by simply proclaiming “the KRUSTY KRAB mark is strong, having acquired distinctiveness through secondary meaning,” it’s fair to ask—which KRUSTY KRAB mark or marks is the court deeming strong, and is it comparing defendants’ use to one, some, or all of plaintiff’s common law and registered marks? [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
Judge Mark [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
Could the Metaverse be the new ‘Wild West’ of trade marks, bringing with it problems of trade mark squatters? [read post]
