Search for: "Matter of McCann" Results 161 - 180 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
However, there appears to be a clause (according to Michael McCann's May 15, 2014 Sports Illustrated story entitled "How the NBA can keep both Sterlings away from the Clippers, which is based on his communications with Larry Coon, an expert in NBA governance and salary), Article 13 in the NBA constitution preventing unethical conduct and taking positions that damage the NBA, and Article 14 provides the exact legal procedure to remedy a breach of Article 13, which is not so much a… [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As with an award of an attorney's fee made pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (b), the court will base its decision primarily upon both parties' ability to pay, the nature and extent of the services required to deal with the support dispute, and the reasonableness of their performance under the circumstances as was held in McCann v Guterl and Matter of Barnes v Barnes. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am by Peter Mahler
The Second Department’s 1998 Porciello ruling likewise made no mention of subject matter jurisdiction; it simply parroted Warde-McCann. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
The press coverage of the new police investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has led to complaints by her parents and Roy Greenslade raises the question “Is it time for the press regulator to step in? [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am by J
Well, that might now be overstating matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am by J
Well, that might now be overstating matters. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There was a 101 rejection in Ex parte McCANNE“Abstract software code is an idea without physical embodiment . . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:40 am by Carole (Staff Lawyer)
You might recognize some of the cases:  Travis Vader (the McCann disappearance); Travis Baumgartner (the G4S shooting) and the Baby M case. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
He did not, however, accept the argument that the claim should be struck out because the institution is prevented from bringing a defamation action: “In this jurisdiction, if it were decided that as a matter of public policy universities should not have the right to sue for libel, that could only be implemented by the legislature or, perhaps, by the Supreme Court“. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]