Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy" Results 161 - 180 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 10:01 am by Jesse Dill
Facebook posts can be considered matters of public concern; however, the Court does not believe Plaintiffs Carter and McCoy have alleged sufficient speech to garner First Amendment protection. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Rather than file a response to Giustra’s claim, Twitter sought to have the matter dismissed out of B.C. courts, arguing that California, where Twitter has its headquarters, would be the correct jurisdiction but its arguments were rejected. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Details will matter as will implementation. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
McCoy Issue: When a creditor increases the periodic rate on a credit card account in response to a cardholder default, pursuant to a default rate term that was disclosed in the contract governing the account, does Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
 A party will not be heard to complain, or attack its adversary, about failure to produce materials never requested.[13] Citing Rule 26(a) and its subsections, which deal with the report, and not discovery beyond the report, several cases take a narrow view of disclosure as embodied in the report requirement.[14] In one case, McCoy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
McCoy, which was issued on January 24, 2011, and Auer v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
On the other hand, the issue is so undeniably important as a practical matter, and the courts are so splintered, that the Supreme Court should do something. [read post]