Search for: "Matter of Said v Said" Results 161 - 180 of 30,695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
That case involved a criminal matter, and libel is a civil matter, but Drake and Lamar have accused each other of criminal activity. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am by Tobin Admin
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The plaintiffs sought to rely on a 1969 Delaware Superior Court opinion, Wright Construction Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
” The Court said that parties should bring forward sufficiently substantiated arguments on why the information must be protected, otherwise the request for confidentiality will be denied. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In an 8-1 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said, “given that Westboro’s speech was at a public place on a matter of public concern, that speech is entitled to 'special protection' under the First Amendment. [read post]