Search for: "Matter of W J. (B J.)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Unknown
(E) A test of the hearing and eyesight of the applicant, and of other matters that may be necessary to determine the applicant’s mental and physical fitness to operate a motor vehicle upon the highways, and whether any grounds exist for refusal of a license under this code. (2) (A) Before a class A or class B driver’s license, or class C driver’s license with a commercial endorsement, may be issued or renewed, the applicant shall have in his or her driver record a… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
This brief argued that the court need not engage in balancing the interests of the legislative and executive branches because (a) the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended in 2014, forecloses the ability of a former president to assert executive privilege without the incumbent’s support and (b) Biden’s rejection of Trump’s executive privilege claim, in any event, constituted a waiver of the privilege. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
But, as a practical matter, the committee may never receive it. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
This matters because 1591 requires a higher level of defendant scienter than 1595–so high that plaintiffs will have a difficult time showing it. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm by Bill Marler
§555(b), in particular, requires that “[w]ith due regard for the convenience and necessity of the parties…and within a reasonable time, each agency shall proceed to conclude a matter presented to it. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm by Bill Marler
§555(b), in particular, requires that “[w]ith due regard for the convenience and necessity of the parties…and within a reasonable time, each agency shall proceed to conclude a matter presented to it. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
We reject this contention because the challenged statements implicate matters of public concern and thereby fall squarely within First Amendment protections…. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
No dominant subtest, even w/in circuits. [read post]