Search for: "May v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 132,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
On May 2, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962) (holding that a state may not criminalize the status of being a drug addict), and conduct, which generally may be punished. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Judgments may differ depending on whether a work was confiscated in Axis countries such as Germany and Italy, on the soil of one of the Allied countries like France or the United Kingdom, or in a neutral state like Switzerland. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
” “During the investigation into one of those seven cases, Fields v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:58 am
Peugh et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
" Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONB. v Structure Tone, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
As mentioned above, on 2 May 2024, there was a statement in open court in Percival v Belfield QB-2022-000902. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:14 am
Reference: Counterman v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:31 am
In Figlio v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
” And if an official has authority to speak for the State, he may have the authority to do so on social media even if the law does not make that explicit. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
