Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 161 - 180
of 824
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 11:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
They were on their own.Ants v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Kitchen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Jeremy Gordon summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Hungary v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am
McConnell drafted a bill that included a $2k stimulus check and a repeal of Section 230, but it never got a vote. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Hundreds of people participated in what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell condemned as a “failed insurrection” and, as Bobby Chesney described on the National Security Law Podcast, the events included a “cartoonish avalanche of crimes. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
The Court could have easily GVR'd the 6th Circuit's panel, and stated that it did not faithfully apply Diocese. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
And the nature of the business conducted at those ordinary sessions — whether, for example, Senators must vote on nominations, or may return to their home States to meet with their constituents — is a matter for the Senate to decide. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Kim, Commentary on Burwell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
Jones v. [read post]
