Search for: "Merck, Sharpe "
Results 161 - 180
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:52 pm
• Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; N.V. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
A couple of days ago, we watched the lovely “St. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 2015 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
The Inn Sign for the Beehive public house in Grantham Photo Wikipedia The Lincolnshire town of Grantham educated one of the world's greatest scientists and the first woman ti be British prime minister (see "Frit" - Merck Sharp Dohme Corp v Teva Pharma BV 25 March 2012). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:49 am
But this bit of scimitar-sharp logic did not put a halt to the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
By agreement, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) was permitted to use the MERCK trade mark in the US and Canada, but its use in certain other territories was restricted. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:57 am
• GlaxoSmithKline LLC • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation • Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
The UK High Court recently gave its judgment in the case of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd (collectively referred to in the judgement as BMS) v Teva Pharma B.V. and Teva UK Ltd (Teva) (decision). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Merck Canada Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Sigma Pharmaceuticals plc Prior to their accession to the European Patent Convention, several states did not allow patent protection for pharmaceutical products. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:34 pm
Likewise after voluntary licensing efforts with Merck failed, Brazil issued CL for AIDS drug Efavirenz, but due to lack of technological expertise, they had to import the drug. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:17 am
In November 2011, Merck Sharp & Dohme paid $950 million to resolve its criminal and civil liabilities related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:54 am
Merck had to pull the drug from the market, but the damage was done and many people were hurt solely because they requested a drug that had been so widely advertised on TV. [read post]
