Search for: "Miller v. Department of Corrections" Results 161 - 180 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Under the statute, commissioners of the Virginia Department of Corrections were directed to review for possible commitment all prisoners about to be released who "receive a score of four or more on the Rapid Risk Assessment for Sexual Offender Recidivism". [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
  The second, was the trial of a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Decision of the Complaints Committee – 28045-20 Coutts v The Scottish Sun, Relevant code provisions, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction New Issued Cases There were 12 new cases issued in the Media and Communications List between 4 and 11 July 2021:  4 data protection cases, 6 defamation cases, one injunction case, and one harassment case. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
The written consent required under this paragraph shall state that the person seeking the consent is required to register as a sex offender with the department of corrections. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017   [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Happersett (the 1875 case holding that the Fourteenth Amendment did not afford women the right to vote), and Miller v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 2, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem's gender/discharge etc claim6th Circuit Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:46 am by clayton
RESPONSE: It is no secret that I was formerly employed by the Utah Department of Corrections for sixteen years. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]