Search for: "Morris's Case"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
Ravitch Restricted access Chapter 12: The view: propertizing the visibility of distance Sarah Marusek and Anne Wagner Restricted access Chapter 13: Semiotic insecurity and fake news law Ahmad Pakatchi Restricted access Chapter 14: Beware of (bad and dangerous) metaphors: remarks made at the intersection of cognitive linguistics and law Angela Condello Restricted access Chapter 15: Semiotics of international law Michael Salter Restricted… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Re Kooperman is cited in Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (“Dicey”), paragraph 31-084 as an example of how the English Courts may, in certain circumstances, circumvent the immovables rule: “A foreign trustee who would otherwise be met by the obstacle contained in this Rule may be able to mitigate its effect if the English court, in [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:54 am
As is the case with too many other issues. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:39 am
Duane Morris Takeaway: This week’s episode of the Class Action Weekly Wire features Duane Morris partner Jerry Maatman and special counsel Eden Anderson with their discussion of a PAGA case currently before the California Supreme Court weighing whether trial courts have inherent authority to ensure that PAGA claims will be manageable at trial, and to … Continue reading "The Class Action Weekly Wire – Episode 39: PAGA Faces Potential Transformation… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Historically, it has been Republicans who used dire warnings and shock value in advertising to make their case on the issue. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am
On 25 October 2023, HHJ Hacon (sitting as a High Court Judge), rendered his judgment in Philip Morris v Nicoventures[1]. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:19 pm
Through the use of case studies, Matt and I will answer the following: Isn’t the PWFA just another version of the ADA? [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
Stephen Jones, and Alan's daughter, Hilary, kindly shared a short obituary with IPKat readers.Rose Hughes analysed the recent decision in Philip Morris v BAT [2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat), which dealt with the standard for invalidity due to added matter. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:58 am
Riley Duane Morris Takeaways: In a case with significant consequences for employers, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Estrada v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
Also well done to Liam Hale of Winckworth Sherwood and Tom Morris of Landmark Chambers on this one.) [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
(This is an IJ case.) [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:23 am
We cover the Morris worm, the Paris Hilton hack, and the earliest Bulgarian virus writer's nemesis. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:04 am
"The case in Philip Morris v BAT related to the validity of BAT's patent EP (UK) 3367830 B1 for a heat-not-burn device. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
The Court explained: For Confrontation Clause purposes, it was not for the judge to determine whether Hemphill’s theory that Morris was the shooter was unreliable, incredible, or otherwise misleading in light of the State’s proffered, unconfronted plea evidence. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:23 am
RELATIONS In a warning to China, President Biden yesterday reiterated the United State’s “ironclad” defense commitment to the Philippines in case of any attack in the disputed South China Sea. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
Five case studies are its foundation, and they rise above the anecdotal to the operatic and thought-provoking. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 8:35 am
The case is in the US District Court for the District of Montana Butte Division. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
“This case is about seeking justice for all the victims involved in this case,” says Keches Law Partner Jonathan Sweet. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 2:55 pm
*Thank you, reader Morris, for finding the IRS news release. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
Duane Morris Takeaway: This week’s episode of the Class Action Weekly Wire features Duane Morris partners Jerry Maatman and Shireen Wetmore with their discussion of the $36 million settlement approved last week resolving claims from multiple cases in both federal and California state court challenging an employer’s wage and hour practices. [read post]
