Search for: "Mr. Jacobs" Results 161 - 180 of 957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In the absence of such evidence Yelton J found in favour of Mr Bent.Lord Justice Jacob delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In the absence of such evidence Yelton J found in favour of Mr Bent.Lord Justice Jacob delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:37 pm by ernst
He produced a television interview with Colonel and Mrs. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Yes, it’s another hip hop employment law lesson, this time honoring the late great Gregory Edward Jacobs a/k/a Shock G a/k/a Humpty Hump. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 3:11 am
This excellent event included experts from UK's intellectual property elite, including members of its judiciary - Lord Hoffmann, Lord Justice Jacobs, and Mr Justice Pumfrey - and representatives from the European Commission and UK Patent Office.Chatham House rules prevail, but one thing that struck this particular moggy (especially in the light of recent debate on this site) was the discussion of patent law and the "patent system. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
And I do not accept one line of argument advanced on behalf of Mr Smith, namely that the circumstances relevant to the Reasonable Belief requirement include “(1) the status and characteristics of the publisher including (a) whether or not s/he/it is a professional media organisation/journalist, (b) the journalistic training and experience of the person concerned … . [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by dov jacobs
by dov jacobs [Dov Jacobs is an Assistant Professor of International Law at Leiden University. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Mr Jelcic's application was opposed by Elvis Presley Enterprises, seemingly because consumers might believe that the business was endorsed by the late Mr Presley. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:59 am by Steve Statsinger
” As for proximate causation, under the circuit’s “zone of risk” approach - thanks again, Mrs. [read post]