Search for: "N F v. State of Indiana" Results 161 - 180 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Finding for the plaintiffs, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held: "we find that there was probative evidence that [cooperative’s] losses were due to a failure to hedge. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
Concluding that the action was properly dismissed, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. * * * Although Indiana Trial Rule 5(F)(3) does not state that the filing fee is requiredâ€â [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
The SG says that whether review is warranted “is a close question,” but “[o]n balance” the case warrants review to resolve a conflict between the Washington Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323–24 (11th Cir. 1992); Southern Methodist University Ass'n v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323–24 (11th Cir. 1992); Southern Methodist University Ass'n v. [read post]