Search for: "N F v. State of Indiana" Results 161 - 180 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
The SG says that whether review is warranted “is a close question,” but “[o]n balance” the case warrants review to resolve a conflict between the Washington Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323–24 (11th Cir. 1992); Southern Methodist University Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:33 am by Susan Brenner
Correa, 653 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 2011) (emphasis added) (quoting Bond v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 646 F.2d 203, 205, n. 3 (5th Cir.1981), the Fifth Circuit rejected the Amendment XIII argument that a court appointing a lawyer to represent involuntarily someone is an involuntary servitude violation. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Neil N., 93 A.D.3d 1107, 1109 n., [3d Dept. 2012] Nevertheless, the frequency and age of the alleged conduct remains relevant in assessing whether there is “a pattern of imminent and ongoing danger to the” petitioner that would warrant relief. [read post]